Gabelstapler, designed by Porsche
US Design Patent Nummer 606274 wurde vor einigen Tagen veröffentlicht. Eigentümer ist die Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. Irgendwie scheint uns das Fahrzeug nicht ganz in die Reihe der Sportwagen zu passen…
aber keiner traut sich, das Wort “Krieg” auszusprechen.
Irgendwie peinlich, wie in der deutschen Oeffentlichkeit das K-Wort umgangen wird. Obwohl doch jeder weiss, dass in Afghanistan Krieg herscht. Wenn selbst Friedensnobelpreistraeger Obama seine Truppen in den Krieg nach Afghanistan schickt - und hier in den USA herrscht kein Zweifel, dass es um den “War in Afghanistan” geht - sollte man sich vielleicht auch in Deutschland an die naheliegende Sprachregelung anpassen. Ehrlichkeit ueber ihren Einsatz waere den deutschen Soldaten jedenfalls zu wuenschen.
Who says an animation can’t be patented? Just file several patents in a row…
This shows an animated PepsiCo logo that has been patented in consecutive Design Patents D601573 through D601577.
Another one of those examples how design patents make the world a richer place.
Isn’t this a pretty screw?
The USPTO just granted a design patent (D601004) for this truly novel and non-obvious design of a screw.
Wie eine aktuelle Statistik des amerikanischen Patentamtes zeigt ist die Zahl der erlaubten Patentanmeldungen im Verhältnis zur Gesamtzahl aller Patentanmeldungen stark rückläufig. Vor wenigen Jahren wurden noch fast 3 von 4 Patentanmeldungen erlaubt - heute liegt die Zahl bei weniger als 1 in 2.
Für das USPTO ist diese Statistik alamierend, denn weniger erteilte Patente bedeuten weniger Erhaltungsgebühren, und damit weniger Einnahmen für’s Patentamt.
Schaut man sich allerdings so manche früher erteilten Patente an, beispielsweise die in US Patent 5443036 patentierte Methode eine Katze zu unterhalten, musste wirklich etwas geschehen, um die Qualität erteilter Patente zu verbessern.
A few weeks ago I passed the “patent bar exam” and am now officially a registered patent agent with my very own registration number: 59184.
By the way: My study material is also available on the web at Patentbarquestions.com - the page was a nice motivation to sort everything I had read about the patent bar exam and go over details again and again…
Another site I created, this one is German, is usa-patent.de, following the same concept of making use of the material I had to create while studying anyway.
One of the most interesting projects I had a chance to lead: Getting XM Navtraffic into the 2005 Cadillac CTS:
http://www.gpsworld.com/gpsworld/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=165057
I just read through the “Web Safety Guarantee” of everbank. The guarantee covers 100% of any losses due to “A computer crime that EverBank security system fails to prevent”.
That seems awefully generous, given the poor web safety standard of US banks in general and EverBank in particular compared e.g. to their German counterparts.
I have used online bank accounts in Germany for years. To ensure security those banks use two layers of authentication: A password to gain access to the account in the first place and a one-time transaction authorization number (TAN) for each transaction. Those TANs come in a long list by mail and are worthless once used. In a new twist bank are going one step further and sending the transaction number via SMS right when needed - further increasing security against stolen TANs or certain man-in-the-middle attacks.
In case that anyone obtains my passwort (e.g. due to a security breach within Microsoft Windows) a hacker would still not be able to transfer any money out of my German bank account without valid TAN numbers. In most US banks the hacker would gain access to the account and be able to transfer money. It seems pretty clear to me: Everbank and other US banks security system would fail to prevent an attack that every German bank would have stopped - hence the liability for such an attack should rest with EverBank.
One question I have never been able to answer though: Why is it, that US banks just don’t care? Are US customers really that lazy that typing in a TAN to increase the security of their bank account is too much? Or do US banks believe their customers can’t handle the complexity of password and TAN?
Here is a link to my latest project: A US-Patent Wiki for German inventors. It’ll one day be a comprehensive information source especially for German inventors interested in obtaining a US Patent.
